Small enough to begin
Start with Raw, Wiki, and Outputs. Add modules only when your actual work needs them.
Open source · Codex · Markdown · Obsidian
Eleven Codex skills for students, researchers, and knowledge workers. Capture scattered information, connect atomic notes, preserve project evidence, review experience, and observe personal patterns without rushing to fixed conclusions.
The system is designed around what happens after capture: understanding, evidence, action, reflection, and reuse.
Start with Raw, Wiki, and Outputs. Add modules only when your actual work needs them.
Atomic notes link to meaningful sources, topics, dependencies, and applications rather than decorative backlinks.
An onboarding interview considers goals, habits, existing files, and privacy boundaries before proposing a structure.
Resources are inputs. Capability is supported by explanation, practice, feedback, exception handling, and transfer evidence.
Follow questions, evidence, decisions, execution, validation, retrospectives, delivery, and later updates.
Keep context, confidence, counterevidence, and alternative explanations. One event never becomes a personality verdict.
Use one stage or follow a learning experience or project through the complete loop.
Call $knowledge-vault when you do not know where to begin. It routes your request to the shortest relevant workflow.
Routes requests across setup, intake, organization, growth, projects, output, and review.
Interviews needs and privacy boundaries before creating a minimum viable vault.
Processes mixed material while preserving sources and distinguishing fact, judgment, and inference.
Creates focused reusable notes and searches for existing knowledge before adding another file.
Adds Obsidian workflows while keeping the underlying Markdown portable.
Assesses learning candidates, capacity, practice, and capability evidence.
Connects a small transferable insight to an observable real-world practice.
Tracks goals, decisions, evidence, interruption recovery, validation, and completion.
Reviews projects or periods from recorded events and turns learning into a next experiment.
Examines recurring preferences and work patterns without diagnosis or fixed labels.
Creates audience-specific work with source versioning and disclosure control.
The same evidence-aware structure can support a long project or hold an idea that is not ready for commitment.
Preserve scope, decisions, execution evidence, interruption state, acceptance, and review.
Connect questions, sources, hypotheses, experiments, failures, and provisional findings.
Move from resources toward explanation, practice, feedback, and transfer.
Keep small moments of insight, candidate ideas, and evidence of changing goals or preferences.
After installation, open a new Codex task, call $knowledge-vault, and describe the one thing you most want to clarify.
python -X utf8 scripts/install_codex_skills.py <codex-skills-directory> --profile full --dry-run
python -X utf8 scripts/install_codex_skills.py <codex-skills-directory> --profile full
python -X utf8 scripts/install_codex_skills.py <codex-skills-directory> --profile full --verifyInitial setup begins with an interview and a preview of proposed files. The skill writes only after authorization.
Each skill has a source and a stated boundary. These references explain design choices; they do not establish that the complete suite has been experimentally validated.
W3C PROV supports source traceability. Sönke Ahrens's How to Take Smart Notes informs atomic notes and meaningful links.
ISO 9241-210 supports understanding people and context first. Deliberate-practice research and Make It Stick inform practice and retrieval evidence.
David Kolb's experiential learning cycle and Donald Schön's The Reflective Practitioner connect action, reflection, and the next experiment.
The source, translation, and limits for all 11 skills are listed in the theoretical foundations.
Version 0.1.3 is released under the MIT License. Automated checks cover repository contracts, links, privacy, installation, and minimum-vault creation; they are not presented as complete live Codex behavior evaluation.
These answers also define the current limits of the project.
No. It is a Codex skill suite built around portable Markdown files. Obsidian Properties, Wikilinks, Bases, and dashboard conventions are available as an optional adapter.
Yes. The bootstrap workflow inspects existing structure and migration constraints instead of forcing a fixed directory design.
Important writes and initial setup are previewed first. Without write authorization, the skills provide proposals only.
No. A separate atomic note is useful only when one reusable question or conclusion deserves independent retrieval. Existing knowledge should be updated first.
It supports evidence-based self-observation with context, confidence, alternatives, and counterevidence. It does not diagnose or infer a fixed personality from a single event.
No. Individual modules draw from established work on provenance, note-taking, deliberate practice, experiential learning, and reflection. The complete suite still needs broader user feedback and live behavior evaluation.